世界石油


(彭博社)“先锋自然资源公司前首席执行官斯科特·谢菲尔德表示,联邦监管机构歪曲事实并错误地诽谤他,称他试图与欧佩克勾结以支撑原油价格, 图 1。

谢菲尔德是美国页岩油行业崛起的关键人物, 周二向联邦贸易委员会提出请求 ,要求该机构撤销其对埃克森美孚公司以 600 亿美元收购先锋公司拟议的同意令。

“联邦贸易委员会暗示我曾经参与、提倡甚至建议任何形式的反竞争行为是错误的,”谢菲尔德在一份声明中表示。

本月早些时候,联邦贸易委员会表示,如果谢菲尔德被禁止进入这家超级巨头的董事会,那么它不会提起诉讼来阻止埃克森美孚收购先锋公司。该机构表示,发现证据表明谢菲尔德试图与石油输出国组织和其他组织就石油定价和产量进行沟通。

在一份在线声明中,谢菲尔德和先锋公司回应了联邦贸易委员会的指控,并证明“这些指控基于虚假叙述、对事实和证据的错误描述以及对适用法律的毫无根据的解释。”此外,该声明还称要求委员会撤销拟议同意令并驳回诉讼程序,无需采取进一步行动

谢菲尔德先生在谈到网上评论时表示,“这份文件详细阐述了为什么联邦贸易委员会暗示我曾经参与、提倡甚至建议任何形式的反竞争行为是错误的。”

他继续说,“这还表明,公开和无理地诽谤我将对我们经济任何部门的商界领袖满足股东需求和行使其受宪法保护的权利来为其行业发声的能力产生令人寒心的影响。”

谢菲尔德的律师在提交给 FTC 的 23 页文件中写道,FTC 正在“训练”寻找理由来批评埃克森美孚收购先锋的交易。文件显示,谢菲尔德于 4 月 9 日接受了监管机构长达 6 个月的合并调查的四个小时的宣誓审查,“但没有询问有关他的通讯的问题,也没有给他机会解释这些问题”。 。

谢菲尔德的律师反驳了联邦贸易委员会关于他与欧佩克官员交换了数百条短信的说法。

文件显示,他曾向欧佩克官员发送一条短信,但那是为了将前欧佩克秘书长穆罕默德·巴尔金多与德克萨斯铁路委员会联系起来,“这是政府正式程序的一部分”。谢菲尔德的律师写道,其他短信是向许多收件人发送新闻报道等公共信息的“最后一条短信”。

世界石油公司为第 5-7 段添加了背景内容。


原文链接/OilandGas360

World Oil


(Bloomberg) – Former Pioneer Natural Resources Co. Chief Executive Officer Scott Sheffield says federal regulators mischaracterized facts and wrongly vilified him in saying he tried to collude with OPEC to prop up crude prices, Fig. 1.

Sheffield, a key figure in the rise of the U.S. shale industry, filed a request Tuesday with the Federal Trade Commission asking the agency to vacate its proposed consent order for Exxon Mobil Corp.’s $60 billion takeover of Pioneer.

“The FTC is wrong to imply that I ever engaged in, promoted or even suggested any form of anti-competitive behavior,” Sheffield said in a statement.

Earlier this month, the FTC said it would not sue to block Exxon’s takeover of Pioneer, provided that Sheffield be barred from the supermajor’s board. The agency said it found evidence Sheffield tried to communicate with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and others about oil pricing and output.

In an online statement, Sheffield and Pioneer addressed the FTC’s allegations and demonstrated that “they are based on a false narrative, mischaracterization of the facts and evidence, and a baseless interpretation of the applicable law.” Additionally, the statement called on the Commission to vacate the Proposed Consent Order and dismiss the proceeding without further action

Referring to the online comment, Mr. Sheffield said, “This document lays out in detail why the FTC is wrong to imply that I ever engaged in, promoted or even suggested any form of anti-competitive behavior.”

He continued, “It also shows how publicly and unjustifiably vilifying me will have a chilling effect on the ability of business leaders in any sector of our economy to address shareholder demands and to exercise their constitutionally protected right to advocate for their industries.”

The FTC was “straining” to find a reason to criticize Exxon’s deal for Pioneer, Sheffield’s lawyers wrote in the 23-page filing to the agency. Sheffield was examined under oath for four hours by the regulator on April 9 as part of its six-month investigation into the merger “but did not ask questions about his communications and gave him no opportunity to explain them,” according to the filing.

Sheffield’s lawyers refute the FTC’s claim that he exchanged hundreds of text messages with OPEC officials.

He had sent one text message to an OPEC official, but that was to connect former OPEC Secretary General Mohammad Barkindo with the Texas Railroad Commission “as part of an official government proceeding,” according to the filing. The others were “blast text messages” sending public information such as news stories to many recipients, Sheffield’s lawyers wrote.

World Oil has added context to paragraphs 5-7.