美国全国广播公司财经频道


德克萨斯州的一名联邦法官周三表示,埃克森美孚可以提起诉讼,禁止激进投资者提出气候变化提案,该案引发了人们对其未来对股东决议影响的担忧。

美国德克萨斯州北区地区法官马克·皮特曼 (Mark Pittman) 裁定,埃克森美孚可以 对总部位于波士顿的阿朱纳资本 (Arjuna Capital) 提起诉讼,但驳回了这家石油巨头对第二位激进股东 Follow This 的索赔,因为该公司总部位于荷兰。

埃克森美孚 在 5 月 29 日的年度股东大会上提交了一份提案,呼吁该公司加速二氧化碳减排后,于 1 月份 起诉了这两家投资者。

Arjuna 和 Follow This 随后撤回了该提案,但埃克森美孚继续对这两家公司提出索赔,称它们可以在未来的股东大会上提交类似的提案。

埃克森美孚的主张是基于美国证券交易委员会的规定,该规定允许公司在处理与公司正常业务运营相关的事项时排除股东决议,或者 与过去五年提出的提案基本相似。

皮特曼表示,Arjuna 和 Follow This 遵循的是“特洛伊木马”模式,他们聚集了石油公司足够的股份来投票并提交旨在应对气候变化的提案。

这位由前总统唐纳德·特朗普于 2019 年任命为联邦法官的法官表示,埃克森美孚不应因不信任激进投资者而受到指责。他表示,Arjuna 可以稍微修改其已撤回的 2024 年提案,以提交给未来的股东大会。

“相反,该公司的立场是对坚决反对大型石油公司的实体的理性回应,”皮特曼写道。 “xxon 很大。埃克森美孚是石油公司。另一家法院已经发现,至少被告的领导层对埃克森美孚“明显存在偏见”。

Arjuna 自称为“可持续投资公司,与经过认可的投资者和机构合作,以可持续发展为目标进行资产投资”,该公司没有立即回复 CNBC 的置评电子邮件请求。

 

主要图片(来源:路透社)


原文链接/OilandGas360

CNBC


A federal judge in Texas on Wednesday said ExxonMobil can sue to bar a climate change proposal from an activist investor, in a case that has raised concerns about its future effect on shareholder resolutions.

U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman for the Northern District of Texas ruled that Exxon’s lawsuit can proceed against Boston-based Arjuna Capital, but dismissed the oil major’s claim against a second activist shareholder, Follow This, because the firm is based in the Netherlands.

Exxon sued the two investors in January after they submitted a proposal to be tabled at the May 29 annual shareholder meeting that called for the company to accelerate carbon dioxide emissions reductions.

Arjuna and Follow This subsequently withdrew the proposal, but Exxon proceeded with its claims against the two firms, arguing that they could file similar proposals at future shareholder meetings.

Exxon’s claims are based on Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to exclude shareholder resolutions if they deal with a matter relating to the company’s ordinary business operations, or are substantially similar to proposals offered in the past five years.

Pittman said Arjuna and Follow This were following a “Trojan Horse” model in which they aggregate enough shares in oil companies to vote and submit proposals aimed at fighting climate change.

The judge, appointed to the federal bench by former President Donald Trump in 2019, said Exxon should not be faulted for distrusting the activist investors. He said Arjuna could slightly modify its withdrawn 2024 proposal for submission to future shareholder meetings.

“Rather, the company’s position is a rational response to entities categorically opposed to Big Oil,” Pittman wrote. “Exxon is big. And Exxon is Oil. And another court has already found at least Defendant has leadership that’s ‘manifestly biased’ against Exxon.”

Arjuna, which calls itself “a sustainable investment firm that works with accredited investors and institutions to invest their assets with a lens toward sustainability,” did not immediately respond to an e-mail request from CNBC for comment.

 

Lead image (Credit: Reuters)