纳斯达克


迪拜——欧佩克秘书长海瑟姆·阿尔盖斯周一指责国际能源署(IEA)诽谤石油和天然气行业,这是各组织之间关于气候政策的最新冲突。

OPEC 主席指责 IEA 诽谤化石燃料行业 - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:路透社

阿尔盖斯指的是西方能源监管机构周四发布的一份报告,该报告称化石燃料行业正面临“关键时刻”,生产商必须在加剧气候危机或转向清洁能源之间做出选择。

阿尔盖斯在一份声明中表示:“这给我们带来了极其狭窄的挑战,或许可以方便地淡化能源安全、能源获取和能源承受能力等问题。”

“这也不公正地诽谤该行业是气候危机的幕后黑手。”

近年来,石油输出国组织(OPEC)和总部位于巴黎的国际能源署在长期石油需求前景和新碳氢化合物供应投资等问题上多次发生冲突。

最新的后果发生之际,欧佩克主要产油国阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)准备在本周末主办 COP28 联合国气候峰会。

阿尔盖斯表示,欧佩克将出席气候谈判。

IEA预计,  随着越来越多的电动汽车上路,以及中国经济在转向清洁能源的过程中增长放缓,世界化石燃料需求将在2030年达到顶峰。

事实上由最大石油出口国沙特阿拉伯领导的欧佩克不同意这一预测。

该组织将此类预测描述为 “危险的” ,并称这些预测往往伴随着停止新的石油和天然气投资的呼声,这将危及能源安全。

在周四的报告中,国际能源署也对碳捕获技术提出了批评。

国际能源署在其网站上发布的声明称,“该行业需要致力于真正帮助世界满足其能源需求和气候目标,这意味着放弃认为大量碳捕获是解决方案的幻想。”

阿联酋是继埃及之后第二个在 2022 年主办气候峰会的阿拉伯国家,它与其他海湾能源生产国一起呼吁进行他们认为更现实的能源转型,其中化石燃料将在确保能源供应方面发挥作用,同时工业脱碳。

阿尔盖斯表示,令人遗憾的是,国际能源署称碳捕集利用和封存(CCUS)等技术是“幻觉”,因为联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会的报告将这些技术视为解决方案的一部分。

“对于那些希望看到真相的人来说,需要说出的真相是简单明了的。“我们面临的能源挑战是巨大而复杂的,不能仅限于一个二元问题。”阿尔盖斯说。

欧佩克和俄罗斯等盟友组成的欧佩克+去年决定在评估石油市场状况时停止使用国际能源署的数据。

沙特阿拉伯还指责国际能源署及其最初预测,由于乌克兰战争,俄罗斯产量将减少 300 万桶/日,导致华盛顿决定出售其储备石油。


原文链接/oilandgas360

Nasdaq


DUBAI – OPEC Secretary General Haitham Al Ghais on Monday accused the International Energy Agency (IEA) of vilifying the oil and gas industry, in the latest clash between the groups over climate policy.

OPEC head accuses IEA of vilifying fossil fuel industry- oil and gas 360

Source: Reuters

Al Ghais was referring to a note published by the West’s energy watchdog on Thursday that said the fossil fuel industry was facing a “moment of truth” where producers had to choose between deepening the climate crisis or shifting to clean energy.

“This presents an extremely narrow framing of challenges before us, and perhaps expediently plays down such issues as energy security, energy access and energy affordability,” Al Ghais said in a statement.

“It also unjustly vilifies the industry as being behind he climate crisis.”

The Organization of the Petroleum-Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the Paris-based IEA have repeatedly clashed in recent years over issues such as long-term oil demand prospects and investment in new hydrocarbon supplies.

The latest fall-out comes as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a major OPEC producer, prepares to host the COP28 U.N. climate summit at the end of the week.

Al Ghais has said OPEC would be present at the climate talks.

The IEA sees world fossil fuel demand peaking by 2030 as more electric cars hit the road and China’s economy grows more slowly while shifting towards cleaner energy.

OPEC, de facto led by top oil exporter Saudi Arabia, disagrees with the prediction.

It has described such projections as “dangerous”, saying they are often accompanied by calls to stop new oil and gas investments which would then jeopardise energy security.

In Thursday’s note, the IEA was also critical of carbon capture technologies.

“The industry needs to commit to genuinely helping the world meet its energy needs and climate goals – which means letting go of the illusion that implausibly large amounts of carbon capture are the solution,” the IEA statement published on its website said.

The UAE, the second Arab country to host the climate summit after Egypt in 2022, has alongside other Gulf energy producers called for what they consider a more realistic energy transition in which fossil fuels would keep a role in securing energy supplies while industries decarbonise.

Al Ghais said it was regrettable the IEA called technologies such as carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) an “illusion”, as they were seen in U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports as part of the solution.

“The truth that needs to be spoken is simple and clear to those who wish to see it. It is that the energy challenges before us are enormous and complex and cannot be limited to one binary question,” Al Ghais said.

OPEC+, which groups OPEC and allies such as Russia, decided last year it would stop using data from the IEA when assessing the state of the oil market.

Saudi Arabia has also blamed the IEA – and its initial prediction for a 3 million barrel per day (bpd) fall in Russian production on the back of the war in Ukraine – for Washington’s decision to sell oil from its reserves.