勘探与生产:新型喷射泵设计提高了可靠性并降低了拥有成本

一种新的泵设计由地面泵提供动力,利用一种流体的动量来移动另一种流体。

Bill Jackson 和 Erik Reissig,Tech-Flo,Tally Energy Services 公司

[编者注:这个故事的一个版本出现在 2020 年 8 月版 的 E&P中它最初于 2020 年 8 月 3 日出版。在此订阅该杂志 。]  

一百多年来,沙漠日落背景下抽油机的形象一直是世界上每个油田的典型。然而,在过去十年左右的时间里,页岩油区不仅在完井方面而且在生产方面改写了剧本。

在这些上部图像下方,当今的井具有 90 度转弯、长支管和大量磨料(例如压裂液和沙子)的特点。这对于具有长杆柱和机械井下泵的抽油机的机械结构来说几乎是不利的。不规则的孔会导致杆和套管磨损。再加上沙子对泵造成损坏,需要进行多次成本高昂的修井、生产损失和利润损失。

成功的页岩气举升方法必须消除尽可能多的移动部件,包括油管和泵本身,同时可靠且具有成本效益,特别是在当今价格大幅跳水的情况下。

一种受到关注的选择是喷射泵,但有一个重要的警告。如今,重新设计的喷射泵配备了更可靠的表面电源,比 20 世纪 80 年代和 1990 年代取得有限成功的喷射泵更加高效和经济。

怎么运行的

喷射泵利用文丘里效应。这是伯努利原理的一个特例,伯努利原理指出,当流体流过带有收缩处的管道(喷嘴)时,流体必须在收缩处加速,从而降低其压力并产生真空。这种真空将地层流体带入喷射泵并到达地面。

喷射泵

喷射泵使用高压流体流(通常产生水,但偶尔产生油)在入口(文丘里管)处产生低压情况,实际上吸入油和伴生气体。在地表,有一个过程将流体分离。

喷射泵本身没有移动部件,依靠地面泵来移动流体流。由于尺寸小且没有移动部件,喷射泵不受固体或气锁的影响,并且可以根据井和地层的需要放置在尽可能深的位置。它很少需要维修,并且当需要维修时,可以轻松地将其翻转以更换喷嘴和混合管,而无需与牵引装置相关的费用和停机时间。

该技术可用于 20 至 6,000 多桶/天的井。

喷射泵设计的主要区别

即使在今天,传统喷射泵装置的缺点之一仍然是选择地面泵。传统的柱塞/多路泵需要持续维护,即使维护得当,也经常出现故障。这会导致停机和昂贵的维修/更换情况。

因此,Tech-Flo 已转向地面上的隔膜 PD 泵和 H 泵、多级离心电动潜水泵 (ESP)。这些泵的拥有成本要低得多,因为 H 泵更可靠,并且只需每季度维护一次。

虽然 H 泵的效率略低于柱塞泵(分别为 70% 和 95%),但它们足以弥补每桶可靠性和提升成本方面的差异。自 2010 年左右以来,H 泵本身的成本已经下降,因为竞争的加剧导致了制造效率的提高。

喷射泵和 H 泵在许多其他领域得到认可,因此它们在生产中的使用也在增加。生产商发现喷射泵对于压裂返排和流体回收非常有价值,因为它能够处理固体和挥发性气体。当流量变化时,无需牵引单元即可快速优化。

对于生产,喷射泵可以以 45 到 70 度的角度深入水平部分,这种放置对于杆式泵来说不是最佳选择,因为杆会磨损管道,而对于 ESP 来说,因为它们很少以该角度放置。

它的多功能性是另一个好处,特别是在新井固有的快速变化的情况下。喷射泵可以处理一口井,其起始产量为 4,000 桶/天,几周后可能降至 2,000 桶/天。服务公司只需更换喷嘴和混合管即可优化滴落生产率。液压举升机比几乎任何其他类型的人工举升系统具有更多的多功能性。

喷射泵还适用于混合喷射泵/气举装置,其中喷射泵回收压裂液,直到天然气生产变得相关。此时,通过钢丝绳回收喷射泵既简单又经济。底部钻具组合可以留在井眼中。这样,如果以后由于压裂偏移、天然气生产中断或压缩机停机而需要将油井恢复到液压举升状态,操作员可以将喷射泵暂时或长期泵回原位,而无需支付任何费用一个牵引单元。

在该领域

在当今的油价环境下,降低成本是每个公司的首要愿望,对于一家在德克萨斯州加尔维斯顿附近的弗里奥地层拥有一口油井的生产商来说也是如此。该井的有杆泵面临运营和井眼问题,运营商每年平均花费 140,000 美元的拉拔和维修成本。

该井已完井深度为 6,800 英尺,套管长度为 5.5 英寸。套管的严重偏差是主要问题,造成了损坏,但也限制了生产。它生产 20 桶/天和 260 桶/天的水。Tech-Flo 安装了喷射泵系统,与现有设备相比,成本降低了 20%。该生产商之前使用了轨道车分离器,并安装了用于地面泵抽吸的抽吸腿,从而无需其他分离设备。

喷射泵使用 70 机械马力将产量提高到 28 桶/天和 400 桶/天。在安装的第一年,喷射泵系统为生产商节省了 133,000 美元的服务和维修成本。

原文链接/hartenergy

E&P Production: New Jet Pump Design Delivers Increased Reliability and Lower Cost of Ownership

Powered by surface pumps, a new pump design harnesses the momentum of one fluid to move another fluid.

Bill Jackson and Erik Reissig, Tech-Flo, a Tally Energy Services company

[Editor's note: A version of this story appears in the August 2020 edition of E&P. It was originally published Aug. 3, 2020. Subscribe to the magazine here.]  

For well more than 100 years, the image of a pumpjack against the backdrop of a desert sunset has typified every oil field in the world. Over the last 10 years or so, however, shale plays have rewritten the playbook not only for completions but for production.

Below those topside images, today’s wells feature 90-degree turns, long laterals and copious amounts of abrasives such as frac fluid and sand. This is hardly conducive to the mechanics of the pumpjack, which feature long rodstrings and mechanical downhole pumps. Irregular holes lead to rod and casing wear. This combines with pump damage from sand to require multiple costly workovers, lost production and loss of profits.

A successful lift method for shale plays must eliminate as many moving parts as possible, both in the tubing and in the pump itself, while being reliable and cost-efficient, especially with today’s wild price dives.

One option gaining traction is the jet pump—with an important caveat. Today’s redesigned jet pumps, with more reliable surface power sources, are vastly more efficient and economical than those that met limited success in the 1980s and 1990s.

How it works

A jet pump uses the Venturi effect. This is a special case of Bernoulli’s principle stating that as fluid flows through a pipe with a constriction in it (nozzle), the fluid must speed up in the restriction, reducing its pressure and producing a vacuum. This vacuum brings formation fluids into the jet pump and to the surface.

Jet Pump

A jet pump uses a high-pressure fluid stream—usually produced water, but occasionally oil—to create a low-pressure situation at the intake (a Venturi), in effect, sucking in the oil and associated gas. At the surface, a process separates the fluids.

The jet pump itself has no moving parts, relying on a surface pump to move the fluid stream. With its small size and lack of moving parts, a jet pump is not affected by solids or gas locking and can be placed as deep as required by the well and formation. It rarely needs servicing and, when it does, it can easily be reversed out to replace the nozzle and mixing tube without the expense and downtime involved with a pulling unit.

This technology can be used in wells from 20 to 6,000-plus bbl/d.

Key differences in jet pump designs

One of the drawbacks to conventional jet pump installations, in many cases even today, has been the choice of surface pump. Traditional plunger/multiplex pumps require constant maintenance and often fail even if properly maintained. This leads to downtime and costly repair/ replacement scenarios.

As a result, Tech-Flo has moved to diaphragm PD pumps and H-pumps, multistage centrifugal electric submersible pumps (ESPs) on the surface. The cost of ownership of these pumps is much lower because H-pumps are more reliable and require maintenance only quarterly.

While H-pumps are slightly less efficient than plunger pumps, 70% compared to 95%, they more than make up the difference in reliability and lifting cost per barrel. The cost of the H-pumps themselves has dropped since about 2010, as an increase in competition has led to greater efficiencies in manufacturing.

Jet pumps and H-pumps are gaining acceptance in many other areas, so their use in production is also rising. Producers find jet pumps invaluable for frac flowback and fluid recovery because of its ability to handle solids and volatile gases. As the flow changes, it can be optimized quickly without a pulling unit.

For production, jet pumps can be set deep into the horizontal section at 45 to 70 degrees—a placement not optimal for rod pumps because the rod would wear against the tubing and for ESPs as they are rarely placed at that angle.

Its versatility is another benefit, especially with the rapid changes inherent in new wells. A jet pump can handle a well that kicks off at 4,000 bbl/d that may drop to 2,000 bbl/d in a few weeks. The service company simply changes the nozzle and mixing tube to optimize the dropping production rates. Hydraulic lift offers more versatility than virtually any other type of artificial lift system.

Jet pumps also lend themselves to hybrid jet pump/gas-lift installations in which the jet pump recovers the frac fluid until gas production becomes relevant. At that point, retrieving the jet pump by wireline is simple and cost-effective. The bottomhole assembly can be left in the wellbore. That way, if the well should later need to be put back on hydraulic lift due to offset fracs, disruption in gas production or compressor downtime, the operator can pump the jet pump back into position, either temporarily or long term—without the expense of a pulling unit.

In the field

In today’s oil price climate, cost reduction is at the top of every company’s wish list, as it was for a producer with a well in the Frio Formation near Galveston, Texas. The well’s rod pump faced operational and wellbore issues that cost the operator an average of $140,000/ year in pulling and repair costs.

The well had been completed to 6,800 ft with 5.5-inch casing. A severe deviation in the casing was the main issue, creating the damage but also limiting production. It produced 20 bbl/d and 260 bbl/d of water. Tech-Flo installed a jet pump system at a 20% cost reduction over the existing equipment. The producer had previously used a rail car separator with a suction leg installed for the surface pump’s suction, which eliminated the need for other separation equipment.

The jet pump boosted production to 28 bbl/d and 400 bbl/d of water using 70 mechanical horsepower. In the first year of installation, the jet pump system saved the producer $133,000 in service and repair costs.