Paisie:价格将取决于 OPEC+ 是否继续减产

为了让市场相信OPEC+有能力影响油价,该国际组织必须收回控制权并维持减产至少到2024年第二季度。 

Stratas Advisors 的约翰·佩西 (John Paisie) 表示,如果需求增长不如预期强劲,OPEC+ 必须愿意实施进一步减产。 

尽管 OPEC+ 在 11 月 30 日举行的会议上宣布进一步减产,但 12 月上旬布伦特原油价格仍跌破 80 美元/桶。

会议上,OPEC+同意将石油产量再减少70万桶/日。这些削减将来自伊拉克、阿联酋、科威特、哈萨克斯坦、阿尔及利亚和阿曼。此外,沙特阿拉伯同意延长1兆桶/天的自愿减产,俄罗斯同意在目前30万桶/天的基础上,将成品油出口减少20万桶/天。额外的减产计划将于今年年初开始。

然而,由于多种原因,宣布的减产并未对石油市场产生太大的直接影响。首先,市场已经预期会议最终同意的进一步削减幅度。其次,由于非洲产油国的反对,会议从11月26日推迟到11月30日,这更加佐证了OPEC+成员国之间合作水平正在减弱的看法。第三,也是最重要的是,削减是自愿宣布的,这表明削减不会全面进行。

地缘政治担忧减少

对地缘政治担忧的减弱也减轻了减产的影响。尽管以色列与哈马斯冲突扩大的可能性仍然存在,但由于石油流动并未受到干扰,风险溢价已经消失。同样,虽然有一些迹象表明美国及其盟国正在考虑加强对俄罗斯石油出口运输的制裁,但目前几乎没有人担心石油流动会受到任何实质性影响。

另一个可能影响石油市场的地缘政治局势是圭亚那和委内瑞拉之间关于埃塞奎博地区的争端。尽管争端仍在发展,但目前预计不会导致军事冲突。

随着宣布减产后油价下跌,目前的市场情绪似乎是OPEC+至少暂时失去了对油价的控制。当然,OPEC+在为油价提供上行支撑的尝试中面临着挑战。

  • 过去两年非 OPEC+ 原油供应的强劲增长(约 2.5 MMbbl/d),包括美国产量的增长(约 1.6 MMbbl/d),给 OPEC+ 带来了进一步的压力; 
  • 尽管过去两年石油需求持续增长(自 2023 年中期以来就超过了供应),但由于全球经济疲软以及替代燃料的作用日益增强,人们担心 2024 年需求增长将放缓和电动汽车;和 
  • 由于对供需的担忧,自9月下旬以来,石油交易商大幅减少了净多头头寸,在沙特宣布自愿减产1兆桶/日之前,其净多头头寸已回落至7月初的水平。

我们认为,OPEC+ 仍然有能力影响油价,特别是建立油价下限,因为 OPEC+ 约占原油供应总量的 48%。巴西加入OPEC+联盟(11月30日OPEC+会议表明)将使OPEC+的份额增加至50%以上。此外,OPEC+是剩余产能的唯一来源。

可能出现供应短缺

我们还认为减产最终将为油价提供支撑。在宣布额外减产之前,我们预测 2024 年第一季度和第二季度石油需求将超过石油供应约 60 万桶/日。因此,OPEC+ 的任何额外减产都将导致进一步的供应赤字。

我们预计非欧佩克供应量将在 2024 年增加,但仅增加 1 MMbbl/d,其中美国供应量在 2023 年预计增加 930,000 桶/天后将增加 330,000 桶/天。由于对二叠纪盆地的更多关注、效率的提高和水力压裂强度的加大(支管长度更长和支撑剂装载量增加),加上 DUC 井的大幅缩减,美国的钻机数量比上一年减少了约 20%,这使得完井成为可能计数达到新冠疫情前的水平。然而,这些策略在增加供应方面的回报将会递减,特别是在 DUC 库存耗尽的情况下。

无论如何,OPEC+成员国将需要至少在第二季度末维持最新一轮减产,以建立有利于油价上涨的基本面,最重要的是,让石油市场相信OPEC+的立场。保持成员之间的凝聚力的能力。此外,如果需求增长不如预期强劲,OPEC+必须愿意准备实施进一步减产。 

原文链接/hartenergy

Paisie: Prices to Depend on Whether OPEC+ Keeps Cuts in Place

To convince the market of OPEC+’s ability to sway oil prices, the international organization will have to take back control and maintain production cuts at least until the second quarter of 2024. 

OPEC+ must be willing to implement additional production cuts if demand growth is less robust than expected, says John Paisie of Stratas Advisors. 

The price of Brent crude oil dropped below $80/bbl during the first part of December, despite OPEC+ announcing additional supply cuts at its meeting held on Nov. 30.

At the meeting, OPEC+ agreed to reduce its oil production by another 700,000 bbl/d. Those cuts will come from Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman. Additionally, Saudi Arabia agreed to extend its voluntary cut of 1 MMbbl/d and Russia agreed to reduce its exports of refined products by 200,000 bbl/d in addition to its current reduction of 300,000 bbl/d. The additional production cuts were to start at the beginning of the year.

The announced production cuts, however, did not have much of an immediate impact on the oil market for several reasons. First, the market was already expecting additional cuts of the magnitude that were finally agreed to at the meeting. Second, the postponement of the meeting from Nov. 26 to Nov. 30 because of pushback from the African producers supported the perception that the level of cooperation between the OPEC+ members is waning. Third, and most importantly, the cuts were announced as voluntary, which suggests that the full extent of the cuts will not take place.

Geopolitical worries decrease

The diminishing concerns about geopolitics also reduced the impact of the production cuts.  While the possibility of the Israeli-Hamas conflict expanding remains, the risk premium has evaporated because the flow of oil has not been disrupted. Likewise, while there have been some indications that the U.S. and allies are considering ways to strengthen the sanctions on the shipment of Russian oil exports, there is currently little concern that the flow of oil will be affected in any material way.

Another geopolitical situation that could affect the oil market is the dispute between Guyana and Venezuela about the Esequibo region. While still developing, the dispute is currently not expected to lead to a military conflict.

With oil prices decreasing after the announced production cuts, the current market sentiment appears to be that OPEC+ has lost, at least temporarily, control of oil prices. Certainly, OPEC+ is facing challenges in its attempts to provide upward support for oil prices.

  • The robust growth in non-OPEC+ crude supply (around 2.5 MMbbl/d) including the growth in U.S. production (around 1.6 MMbbl/d) during the last two years has put further pressure on OPEC+; 
  • While oil demand has continued to increase during the last two years (and outstripped supply since the middle of 2023), there is a concern that demand growth will slow in 2024 because of weakness in the global economy and because of the increasing role of alternative fuels and electric vehicles; and 
  • Because of the concerns pertaining to supply and demand, oil traders have significantly reduced their net long positions since late September and their net long positions have fallen back to the levels of early July, prior to Saudi Arabia announcing its voluntary cut of 1 MMbbl/d.

It is our view that OPEC+ still has the ability to influence oil prices—especially in establishing a floor under oil prices—simply because OPEC+ represents around 48% of total crude oil supply. The addition of Brazil to the OPEC+ alliance (which was indicated at the Nov. 30 OPEC+ meeting) will increase the share of OPEC+ to more than 50%. Additionally, OPEC+ is the only source of spare production capacity.

Supply deficits possible

We also think the production cuts will ultimately provide support for oil prices. Prior to the announcement of the additional cuts, we were forecasting that oil demand would outstrip oil supply by around 600,000 bbl/d during the first and second quarters of 2024. As such, any additional cuts by OPEC+ will result in further supply deficits.

We are expecting non-OPEC supply to increase in 2024, but only by 1 MMbbl/d, with U.S. supply growing by 330,000 bbl/d after increasing by a projected 930,000 bbl/d in 2023. The increase in U.S. supply has occurred even though the U.S. rig count decreased by around 20% from the previous year because of increased focus on the Permian Basin, efficiency gains and greater fracking intensity (longer laterals and increased proppant loading) coupled with a major drawdown in DUC wells, which has enabled the completion count to reach pre-COVID levels. These strategies, however, will have diminishing returns in terms of increasing supply—especially with the inventory of DUCs being depleted.

Regardless, members of OPEC+ will need to keep the latest round of production cuts in place, at least through the end of the second quarter to establish the fundamentals favorable for higher oil prices and, most importantly, to convince the oil market of OPEC+’s ability to maintain cohesiveness among members. Additionally, OPEC+ must be willing to be ready to implement additional production cuts if demand growth is less robust than expected.